◎ 雅思培训
   ·了解雅思
   ·雅思在中国
   ·雅思考试要求
   ·雅思报名考试注意事项
   ·美国哪些大学承认IELTS
   ·课程设置(预科班)
   ·课程设置(单项口语班)
   ·课程设置(基础晚班)
   ·课程设置(基础周末班)
   ·课程设置(强化周末班)
   ·雅思口语面试技巧
   ·雅思阅读测试技巧
   ·雅思写作测试技巧
   ·IELTS考试与免面试
   ·IELTS考试评分标准
   ·雅思考试成绩计算方法
   ·新移民法问答
  ◎ 频道热点
   ·护照申领程序
   ·签证准备须知
   ·出国备忘录
   ·出境过关旅客须知
  ◎ 夏/冬令营
   ·游学澳洲
   ·美国未来领袖夏令营
   ·美国冬令营行成表
   ·新加坡冬令营
   ·新西兰冬令营日程表


IELTS考试评分标准

  
   由于中国地区的考生增多,目前大致需要3-4周收到你的成绩,你也可直接前往英国教育文化处亲自领取成绩,节省邮寄时间.   IELTS考试没有及格和不及格的界限,但是所有学校或移民国家都有一个分数要求,或许进一步对说写听读单科有个别要求,你应向通知单位了解楚.

口语评分标准:
   九分  专家级:充分地掌握了实际运用语言的能力,恰当、准确、流利,而且理解透彻。

  八分  优秀级:充分地掌握了实际运用语言的能力,只偶尔地、局部地出现表达不准确、不恰当的情况。遇到不常见的场景有时理解错误。能处理好复杂详细的论证。

  七分  良好级:掌握了实际运用语言的能力,在某些场景中偶尔表达不准确、不恰当和理解不当。总体上能处理好复杂的语言,理解详细的推论。

  六分  熟练级:尽管有一些不准确,不恰当和理解错误,总体上仍能进行有效的表达。在常见的场景中,能使用和理解相当复杂的语言。

  五分  中等熟练级:虽不能全面地掌握语言,犯有大量错误,在大多数场景中仍明白大概意思。在自己熟悉的方面基本能进行交流。

  四分  初级熟练级:只在常见的场景中基本运用语言。理解和表达均常犯错误。不能运用复杂的语言。

  三分  不熟练级:在很常见的场景中只能表达和懂得大概意思。在交流中经常出现停顿。

  二分  初学者级:不能进行真正的交流,表达常见场景的大部分基本信息只能用不项链的单词或段的结构,且不能展开表达。理解书面语和口语都极为困难。

  一分  非使用者级:除了认识一些单词,基本上不能使用英语。


阅读和听力评分标准
  39 - 42题 —— /9分
  37 - 38题 —— /8.5分
  35 - 36题 —— /8分
  33 - 34题 —— /7.5分
  31 - 32题 —— /7分
  28 - 30题 —— /6.5分
  25 - 27题 —— /6分
  23 - 24题 —— /5.5分
  20 - 22题 —— /5分


写作评分标准:
  Score9
     The reader finds the essay completely satisfactory. 
A point of view is presented and developed, either arguing for and supporting one position or considering alternatiove positions by presenting and discussing relevant ideas and evidence. The argument proceeds logically through the text with a clear progression of ideas. There is plentiful material. A wide range of vocabulary is used appropriately. The reader sees no errors in word formation or spelling. A wide range of sentence structures is used accuratelly and appropriately.

 Score8
     This answer does not fully achieve level 9 in communicative quality, arguments, ideas and evidence. There is a good range of qppropriate vocabulary. The reader sees no significant errors in word formation or spelling. The range of sentence structures used is good, and is well controlled for accuracy and appropriateness.

 Score7
     The reader finds this a satiosfactory essay which generally communicates fluently and only rarely causes strain. A point of view is presented, although it may be unclear at times whether a single position is being taken or alternative positions being considered. The argument has a clear progression overall although there may be minor isolated problems. Ideas and evidence are relevant and sufficient but more specific detail may seem desirable. The range of vocabulary is fairly good and vocabulary is usually used appropriately. Errors in word range of sentence structures occrus and there are only occasinal, minor folws in the control of sentence structure.

  Score6
      The reader finds this a mainly satisfactory essay which communicates with some degeree of fluency.Although there is sometiomes strain for the reader, coutrol of organisational patterns and devices is evident. A point of view is presented although it may be unclear whether a single position is being taken or alternative positions are being considered. The progression of the argument is not always clear, and it may be difficult to distionguish main idea from supporting material. The relevance of some ideas of evidence may be dubious and some specific support may seem desirable. The range of vocabulary sometimes appears limited accompanied by the inappropriateness of its use. Minor limitations of , or errors in, word choice sometiomes intrude on the reader. Word formation and spelling errors occur but are only slightly intrusive. Sentence structures are generally acequate but the reader may feel that control is achieved by the use of a restricted range of strctures or, in contrast, that the use of a wide variety of strctures is not marked by the same level of structural accuracy.

  Score5
      This is an essay which often causes strain for the reader. While the reader is aware of an overall lack of fluency, there is a sense of an answer which has underlying coherence. The essay introduces ideas although there may not be many of them or they may be insufficiently developed. Argrments are presented but may lack clarity, relevance, consistency or support. The range of vocabulary and appropriateness of its use are limited. Lexical confusion and incorrect word choice are noticeable. Word formation and spelling errors may be quite intrusive. There is a limited range of sentence structures and the greatest accuracy is achieved in short, simple sentences. Errors in such areas as agreement of tenses and of subjects and verbs are noticeable.

  Score4
      This essay attempts communication but meaning comes through only after considerable effort by the reader. There are signs of a point of view but main ideas are difficult to distinguish from supporting materials and the amount of support is inadequate. Such evidence and ideas as vocabulary is often inadequate and/or inappropriate. Word choice carses serious problems for the reader. Word formation and spelling errors caurse severe strain for the reader. Limited control of sentence structure, even short and simple ones, is evident. Errors in such areas as agreement of tenses, and of subjects and verbs couse severe strain for the reader.

  Score3
      The seriousness of the problems in this essay prevents meaning from coming through more than spasmodically. The essay has few ideas and no apparent development. Such evidence and ideas as are presented are irrelevant. There is little comprehensible point of view or argument. The reader is aware of gross inadequacies of vocabulary, word forms and spelling. Control of sentence structures is evident only occasionally and errors predominate.

  Score2
      The writing displays no ability to communicate There is evidence of one or two ideas without development. The reader sees no control of word choice, word forms and spelling. There is little or no evidence of control of sentence word choice, word forms and spelling. There is little or no evidence of sentence structures.

  Score1
      The writing appears to be by a virtual non-writer, containing no assessable strings of English writing. If an answer is wholly or almost wholly copied from the source materials it is scored in this category.

  Score0
      Should only be used where a candidate did not attend or did not attempt this question in any way.

 

 

香港国际教育交流中心  版权所有