由于中国地区的考生增多,目前大致需要3-4周收到你的成绩,你也可直接前往英国教育文化处亲自领取成绩,节省邮寄时间.
IELTS考试没有及格和不及格的界限,但是所有学校或移民国家都有一个分数要求,或许进一步对说写听读单科有个别要求,你应向通知单位了解楚.
口语评分标准:
九分 专家级:充分地掌握了实际运用语言的能力,恰当、准确、流利,而且理解透彻。
八分 优秀级:充分地掌握了实际运用语言的能力,只偶尔地、局部地出现表达不准确、不恰当的情况。遇到不常见的场景有时理解错误。能处理好复杂详细的论证。
七分 良好级:掌握了实际运用语言的能力,在某些场景中偶尔表达不准确、不恰当和理解不当。总体上能处理好复杂的语言,理解详细的推论。
六分 熟练级:尽管有一些不准确,不恰当和理解错误,总体上仍能进行有效的表达。在常见的场景中,能使用和理解相当复杂的语言。
五分 中等熟练级:虽不能全面地掌握语言,犯有大量错误,在大多数场景中仍明白大概意思。在自己熟悉的方面基本能进行交流。
四分 初级熟练级:只在常见的场景中基本运用语言。理解和表达均常犯错误。不能运用复杂的语言。
三分 不熟练级:在很常见的场景中只能表达和懂得大概意思。在交流中经常出现停顿。
二分 初学者级:不能进行真正的交流,表达常见场景的大部分基本信息只能用不项链的单词或段的结构,且不能展开表达。理解书面语和口语都极为困难。
一分 非使用者级:除了认识一些单词,基本上不能使用英语。
阅读和听力评分标准:
39
- 42题 —— /9分
37 - 38题 —— /8.5分
35 - 36题 —— /8分
33 - 34题 —— /7.5分
31 - 32题 —— /7分
28 - 30题 —— /6.5分
25 - 27题 —— /6分
23 - 24题 —— /5.5分
20 - 22题 —— /5分
写作评分标准:
Score9
The reader
finds the essay completely satisfactory.
A point of view is presented and developed, either
arguing for and supporting one position or considering
alternatiove positions by presenting and discussing
relevant ideas and evidence. The argument proceeds
logically through the text with a clear progression
of ideas. There is plentiful material. A wide range
of vocabulary is used appropriately. The reader
sees no errors in word formation or spelling. A
wide range of sentence structures is used accuratelly
and appropriately.
Score8
This answer does not fully achieve level 9 in communicative
quality, arguments, ideas and evidence. There is
a good range of qppropriate vocabulary. The reader
sees no significant errors in word formation or
spelling. The range of sentence structures used
is good, and is well controlled for accuracy and
appropriateness.
Score7
The reader finds this a satiosfactory essay which generally
communicates fluently and only rarely causes strain.
A point of view is presented, although it may be
unclear at times whether a single position is being
taken or alternative positions being considered.
The argument has a clear progression overall although
there may be minor isolated problems. Ideas and
evidence are relevant and sufficient but more specific
detail may seem desirable. The range of vocabulary
is fairly good and vocabulary is usually used appropriately.
Errors in word range of sentence structures occrus
and there are only occasinal, minor folws in the
control of sentence structure.
Score6
The
reader finds this a mainly satisfactory essay which
communicates with some degeree of fluency.Although
there is sometiomes strain for the reader, coutrol
of organisational patterns and devices is evident.
A point of view is presented although it may be
unclear whether a single position is being taken
or alternative positions are being considered. The
progression of the argument is not always clear,
and it may be difficult to distionguish main idea
from supporting material. The relevance of some
ideas of evidence may be dubious and some specific
support may seem desirable. The range of vocabulary
sometimes appears limited accompanied by the inappropriateness
of its use. Minor limitations of , or errors in,
word choice sometiomes intrude on the reader. Word
formation and spelling errors occur but are only
slightly intrusive. Sentence structures are generally
acequate but the reader may feel that control is
achieved by the use of a restricted range of strctures
or, in contrast, that the use of a wide variety
of strctures is not marked by the same level of
structural accuracy.
Score5
This
is an essay which often causes strain for the reader.
While the reader is aware of an overall lack of
fluency, there is a sense of an answer which has
underlying coherence. The essay introduces ideas
although there may not be many of them or they may
be insufficiently developed. Argrments are presented
but may lack clarity, relevance, consistency or
support. The range of vocabulary and appropriateness
of its use are limited. Lexical confusion and incorrect
word choice are noticeable. Word formation and spelling
errors may be quite intrusive. There is a limited
range of sentence structures and the greatest accuracy
is achieved in short, simple sentences. Errors in
such areas as agreement of tenses and of subjects
and verbs are noticeable.
Score4
This essay attempts communication but meaning comes through
only after considerable effort by the reader. There
are signs of a point of view but main ideas are
difficult to distinguish from supporting materials
and the amount of support is inadequate. Such evidence
and ideas as vocabulary is often inadequate and/or
inappropriate. Word choice carses serious problems
for the reader. Word formation and spelling errors
caurse severe strain for the reader. Limited control
of sentence structure, even short and simple ones,
is evident. Errors in such areas as agreement of
tenses, and of subjects and verbs couse severe strain
for the reader.
Score3
The
seriousness of the problems in this essay prevents
meaning from coming through more than spasmodically.
The essay has few ideas and no apparent development.
Such evidence and ideas as are presented are irrelevant.
There is little comprehensible point of view or
argument. The reader is aware of gross inadequacies
of vocabulary, word forms and spelling. Control
of sentence structures is evident only occasionally
and errors predominate.
Score2
The
writing displays no ability to communicate There
is evidence of one or two ideas without development.
The reader sees no control of word choice, word
forms and spelling. There is little or no evidence
of control of sentence word choice, word forms and
spelling. There is little or no evidence of sentence
structures.
Score1
The
writing appears to be by a virtual non-writer, containing
no assessable strings of English writing. If an
answer is wholly or almost wholly copied from the
source materials it is scored in this category.
Score0
Should
only be used where a candidate did not attend or
did not attempt this question in any way.